Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mossy Oaks

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was ambiguous.

I count 8 clear "delete" votes, 5 and a half "keep" votes (one probable troll vote discounted) and one clear "abstain". Failing to reach a clear concensus to delete, the decision defaults to "keep" for now.

Noting that there is a solid majority to delete and that in similar situations the community has often recommended that the article be "merged and redirected" to the article about the relevant community, I am going to be bold and do so. Rossami (talk) 06:12, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mossy Oaks

Elementary school. It has one resource class, and one self-contained classroom. Delete. Radiant! 15:02, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, BEEFSTEW score of negative 3 (ABD elementary). —Korath (Talk) 16:29, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Infrogmation 18:24, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable school. DaveTheRed 23:05, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable school. Gamaliel 07:20, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This school is notable and was recently named a Red Carpet school by the South Carolina State Department of Education. Arguably much more notable than the average minor Pokemon monster or character that makes a one time appearance in an episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation. --GRider\^talk 23:33, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • "Red Carpet" school? What does that information mean? How many schools get that label? Is that really a mark of notability? Gamaliel 15:50, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Just like all other schools.--Gene_poole 02:21, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not sufficiently notable in an encyclopedic sense. Jonathunder 05:04, 2005 Mar 8 (UTC)
• Half keep, as I believe they say on Wikipedia. —RaD Man (talk) 11:42, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Schoolcrufta delenda est. Edeans 22:44, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Much beter than most of these. Normally I vote to delete school articles, but in this case weak keep. -- Jmabel | Talk 23:18, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. It's a school. Mark Richards 11:31, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - decent article, verifiable, there's no sensible reason to delete it - David Gerard 15:26, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Abstain. If the "Red Carpet" moniker can be expanded on, this might be a keep. There are too many unanswered questions. - Lucky 6.9 17:30, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not encyclopedic. Jayjg ^(talk) 19:59, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• keep this please. Yuckfoo 20:53, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.