Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moskau (Rammstein song)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. KrakatoaKatie 11:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Moskau (Rammstein song)
Non-notable single album track, fails WP:MUSIC. Prod notice removed. Guinnog 17:00, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - it does contain some pretty unencyclopedic content (e.g. rumors and lyrics), but Rammstein is a notable musician. if it could be re-written it might be saved. JoeSmack Talk(p-review!) 17:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to album article, this song was not a single, so it doesn't matter how notable the band is. Failing that, delete. Punkmorten 19:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Singles by notable bands are generally notable. This isn't a single, though. There are a lot of rammstein album-only song articles that need merging to albums. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 21:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Merge to Reise, Reise. And once more: redirecting/merging does not require the article to be deleted. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 22:32, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Notable song despite not being a single, article gives explanation about the general misconception that the song features Russian duo t.A.T.u.. Remove lyrics though, likely copyvio.--Húsönd 00:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- How is the song notable? Punkmorten 17:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Searching for the song one still gets over 50,000 results on Yahoo, over 100,000 on Google (after removing all the lyrics websites). I've heard that song on the radio many times and I find it hard to believe that it is not notable, although I admit it's hard to find good sources among all the fan sites.--Húsönd 17:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- How is the song notable? Punkmorten 17:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, there's enough here to warrant an independent article. Everyking 04:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think so. Have you looked at the notability guideline? --Guinnog 17:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.