The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. SlimVirgin(talk) 14:58, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Keep. Nomination reasons are false: yes reference; does not read like an ad at all. jnothmantalk 12:36, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Keep I am really beginning to wonder about the motivation for deleting nominating these articles.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 12:55, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.