Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morton Brilliant

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. --Ezeu 08:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Morton Brilliant

Minor, non-notable political operative who edited Wikipedia. Maybe deserves a note in the candidate's page. Gamaliel 21:15, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep as he was a major operative in some notable campaigns. Aplomado - UTC 21:43, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Trim and Merge into Cathy Cox. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:48, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - top manager for Georgia governor race, Washington governor race, South Carolina governor race. - WAS 4.250 21:51, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep but edit significantly to remove the self-referential nature of a lot of the current article. Batmanand | Talk 09:50, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep well written article. And don't trim the Wikipedia stuff, it's appropriate. It's interesting that Wikipedia is now a way for politicians to throw mud at each other. We've crossed the Rubicon of "an anonymous source reveals"... AnonEMouse 19:12, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.9.58.163 (talk • contribs) .
  • Keep Definitely don't trim the Wikipedia stuff. This guy was in charge of campaigns across three states -- AND used Wikipedia as a tool for the campaign. What are you going to do mention this guy on three gubernatorial candidates Wiki entries but not have any reference of who he is? That doesn't make sense. I question the motives of deleting this article. ReporterSteven 20:26, 7 May 2006
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.