Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morgan Featherstone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Nearly Headless Nick 13:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Morgan Featherstone

Morgan Featherstone (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Unsourced biography of a seemingly unnotable person janejellyroll 04:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - fails WP:BIO. MER-C 04:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Seems to have spurred a controversy that was at least national in Australia. Mentioned in a report, and another one here. Here's an article on her. And another. --Wafulz 05:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Also, I've rewritten the article and removed the unsourced/notability tags. --Wafulz 06:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep after rewriting and referencing by Wafulz. --Canley 08:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, after rewriting notability is clear. MaxSem 09:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, jumping aboard the bandwagon. Excellent writing, Wafulz! Lankiveil 10:41, 5 January 2007 (UTC).
  • Keep -- referenced and verifiable. - Longhair\talk 10:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Longhair\talk 11:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 08:30, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete, if no additional non-trivial sources are added we will be back here in a month Alf photoman 15:02, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
    • I have four sources and I'm confident many more exist. Her case was cited in two separate studies and spurred a national controversy, as is noted by two independent newspaper articles from different countries, and she has a German documentary about her. What exactly are you looking for? --Wafulz 18:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I'm the editor who submitted this nomination, but after seeing the rewrites, I think the notability and reference problems have been addressed. I had originally done a search to try to find info about this person and couldn't find it, but obviously the infomation was out there. janejellyroll 02:28, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Nomination withdrawn please close discussion. --Canley 06:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
      • It can't be closed as long as others support deletion. --Wafulz 21:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment changed my vote from week delete to neutral so we can close this... but we will be back if the article does not improve Alf photoman 23:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.