The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete - total absence of context. -- RHaworth 09:08, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
I have no idea what this is supposed to be about, much less why it's notable enough for Wikipedia. But I do know that you're not going to establish this with errant screenshots for which the uploader provides no source info. Daniel Case 06:17, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
I have listed it for speedy as per A1 and A7. GeorgeStepanek\talk 07:15, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Speedy delete per Heah, Andrew Levine, and GeorgeStepanek. It's a copyvio from [1]. --Metropolitan90 07:23, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete Non-notable organisation; not useful for research. -- (aeropagitica) 07:25, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Too broad (and possibly bad per style guidelines) an article name for any topic. Can someone who knows how also list the images for deletion? -- Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 08:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Speedy delete NN clubs and people can be speedied under CSD A7 Werdna648T/C\@ 09:17, 10 January 2006 (UTC)