The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.—Quarl(talk) 2006-12-27 09:19Z
Delete non notable, non verifiable per WP:CHURCH Адам Райли Talk 20:41, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Nothing to make it special enough to keep. Chairman S.TalkContribs 22:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nomination --Mhking 23:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Weak delete Such a long established church should be able to find independent sources in the newspaper office or historical society. Do your homework and re-create with sources. Edison 05:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.