Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montville High School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was nomination withdrawn — Adrian Lamo ·· 20:27, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Montville High School

non-notable high-school; we don't need articles about every high school in America Jim62sch 00:55, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

  • why don't we need them? Hundreds of people have gone to school there, I suppose; that seems notable to me. keep Perle 02:31, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable corporation. — Adrian Lamo ·· 01:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per all. —Eternal Equinox | talk 01:24, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Don't delete this...As long the information in the entry is accurate, there is no need to try and save the bytes of space that this webpage might take up. And no, I do not have an affiliation with this school.

There is no reason to delete a perfectly legitimate hs, there are a number of reasons people might want to search for information about it.

  • Speedy Keep per WP:SCH. We've already gone through this debate. —Cuiviénen, 01:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:SCH. As Cuivienen said, we've already had this debate. Wikipedia:Speedy keep doesn't seem to be applicable here, unless someone wants to close it based on WP:UCS or WP:IAR, which would be fine by me in this instance. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 02:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • keep per above. WP:CORP does not apply as this article is clearly not about a corporation. this school is sufficiently notable, so why delete here? Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 02:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Obvious KEEP -- All schools are notable. PokeCruft (i.e. Perappu) is not. -- Oarias 03:18, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Speedy Keep all high schools --Jaranda wat's sup 03:20, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep seems like there are some notable alumni (alumnis?) with some work it could be a proper article. AdamJacobMuller 03:25, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep per WP:SCH. Schools are not corporations, and the article is verifiable. Carioca 03:55, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep per WP:SCH. Bucketsofg 04:28, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep per WP:SCHOOL. Royboycrashfan 04:50, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, while I don't agree with the policy, WP:SCH sets a fairly low standard for the notability of an educational institution. Kuru talk 05:03, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep precisely per Kuru. Melchoir 06:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, all schools are notable. --Terence Ong 06:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per Kuru --djrobgordon 07:06, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Obvious Keep per WP:SCH Eivind 08:05, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep per everyone else. - Wezzo (talk) (ubx) 11:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Yes, we will have an article about every high school in America within a few years. CalJW 13:46, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep per past discussions. Monicasdude 14:30, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep per WP:SCH. --Siva1979Talk to me 14:42, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and remove excess in article -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 17:27, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep or speedy keep if the nominator will agree to it. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 17:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment If the article can be improved, and maybe if it noted one semi-famous grad I guess keeping it would be OK, so if you want to close this out as a keep, go ahead. Jim62sch 17:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Closure would be out-of-process with votes to delete extant. That said, despite my feelings on WP:SCHOOL, I have no interest in clogging WP:AFD, so I guess I'll WP:IAR and close this. — Adrian Lamo ·· 20:26, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per DUH! its a school keep it!  ALKIVAR™ 18:10, 11 March 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.