Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montrose Christian School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Wizardman 23:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Montrose Christian School
non-notable school has been there as a stub for 10 months and doesn't even say where the school is. Arthurrh 02:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Delete Article isn't even about a school, but rather a basketball player. School perhaps is notable enough to warrant an article, but if it is it needs to be started from scratch anyway. faithless (speak) 02:55, 1 December 2007 (UTC)- Keep Looks fine now. faithless (speak) 08:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: The article, in its current state, should meet speedy deletion criteria (A7) as the article is actually about a NN person from the school. - Rjd0060 03:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. I removed all the info regarding the basketball player. It should be OK now. --Brewcrewer 04:56, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per rewrite. --Brewcrewer 04:56, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep from my understanding of Wiki-precedent stating that all schools are notable. Perhaps this opinion has changed since the last time I was active on AfD. will381796 05:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment even after the rewrite it's nowhere near worth keeping. It's almost a year old and has nothing other than a link to a school website, which in no way makes it notable. Arthurrh 09:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. —Camaron1 | Chris (talk) 12:44, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, weakly... -- DS1953 talk 21:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Delete, Wikipedia is not a directory. CRGreathouse (t | c) 23:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, the article was one sentence when I posted that. CRGreathouse (t | c) 01:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, now has several sourced statements demonstrating notability. AnteaterZot 01:25, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep There are multiple reliable and verifiable sources covering the school and the achievements of its alumni to easily satisfy the Wikipedia:Notability standard. I would strongly suggest that some of our delete voters might want to revisit their position. A reminder that [{Wikipedia:deletion policy]] requires nominators to review potential claims of notability and to consider editing and improving an article before nomination. My first step in assessing potential notability, beyond the content of the article, is to look at other articles linking to the article under consideration, which would have identified several potential claims of notability in this case. Alansohn 01:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Sourced articles which establish notability of the school. Capitalistroadster 01:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep obviously. Usual great work by Alansohn has now established unarguable compliance with WP:N with multiple, independent, reliable sources. TerriersFan 03:07, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Can we go ahead and move this towards a speedy keep as the article is now well sourced and has been expanded? will381796 03:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep References provided. Notability established. LordHarris 08:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep in light of recent expansions, I believe this demonstrates notability. RFerreira 08:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per rewrite -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 06:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as per Alansohn's comment. It's notable. Noroton (talk) 02:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
