Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montres allison

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Montres allison

Montres allison (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Notability in question. ghits for company: [1]. NMChico24 02:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Evidently fails WP:N. The author of the article seems to have some serious axes to grind as well. It could be edited for NPOV, but I don't really see the point without notability. janejellyroll 03:30, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - fails WP:CORP. MER-C 06:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - I had tried editing for NPOV but the current author keeps reverting. Agree that notability is questionable. --Newt43 11:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:CORP -- Selmo (talk) 18:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per all aboveOo7565 20:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
  • REMAIN there is definite notability. This is the only American watch company who manufactures anything. Every other American watch company purchases their components from foreign countries for assembly in the US. In addition, Newt43 has continuously posted links to bulletin board websites and a customer complaint website that doesn't verify anything. The site is well known for allowing defamatory information to be posted and the owner of the website has been sued many times and thumbs his nose at the courts. Newt43 displayed that he could not write anything with a NPOV. He continuosly erased the non-biased information that was previously posted to post his inaccurate information obtained from others with an axe to grind. In fact, Newt43 may be the person who wrote those articles to which he made reference. I would love to know how to retrieve his IP address information. -- IP Address (talk) 18:02, 28 January 2007 (PST) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.9.94.121 (talk • contribs)
    • Please be mindful of civility when making posts. Thank you --NMChico24 01:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Please point out any non-civil comments I made, so I won't repeat them. Thank you. It is not my intention to antagonize anybody, so I would definitely appreciate your help in pointing out the comments I made that were not civil. Thank you --User:IP Address 07:05, 29 January 2007 (PST)—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.9.94.121 (talk • contribs)

Thank you. The person about whom you referred, posted libelous information about Montres Allison and Terry Allison. If my tone seemed hostile to you, please understand that Newt43 caused any hostility that you are perceiving in my tone and comments. Repeating defamatory statements is not a defense against charges of civil nor criminal libel. He should not have continuously posted information about which he had no first hand knowledge and that he knew came from sources that were not accredited members of the press nor organizations well-repsected in the community for consumer complaints. He took disparaging information posted by practically anonymous authors and replaced earlier, accurate information with the disparaging information. He should be ashamed and should be punished for acting in such a manner. Thank you.


  • Remain Has new links that show notability. ip address 14:56, 28 February 1 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:CORP and WP:V, the links provided are either adverts, forums, user-submitted link sites, personal puff pieces, broken web-pages or do not provide any notability from reliable third party sources. After an hour on Google (I was bored) all I can find is news reports of the supposed rip-off linking me to a Press Release on a PR website. This is a company that hasn't made much of an impact on it's own industry's press (except for adverts) let alone local or national news; I can't find any reports from Colorado newspapers or networks about the company at all. The statement that celebrities wear them is unsubstantiated anywhere apart from on the Manufacturers website and press releases, and does not lend notability to the company anyway. - Foxhill 23:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Strongest possible delete: fails WP:N, WP:CORP, WP:NOR, WP:V, and WP:NPOV. Stunning. - Chardish 08:27, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.