Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montreal Metro Tunnel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete per the arguments given. Pointless article.. Black Kite 19:47, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Montreal Metro Tunnel
This article doesn't really refer to anything and is just a placeholder article for the succession boxes for crossings of the St. Lawrence River and Rivière des Prairies. We would be better served by having those succession boxes direct to Line 2 Orange (Montreal Metro) and Line 4 Yellow (Montreal Metro) rather than an article bidon. Montréalais (talk) 15:44, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and use line numbers in the succession box instead as per nom. -- Jao (talk) 16:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 18:08, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 18:08, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Rebuild as a dab page since it's a possible search term. 70.55.89.211 (talk) 05:47, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein (talk) 06:43, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Mentioned only as a "see also" link in one article and a river crossing in an infobox. If someone were actually looking for information on a subway tunnel, it would be presumptive to have some actual information at either location. B.Wind (talk) 15:22, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hersfold (t/a/c) 18:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. As for retaining as a disambig page, the whole system is one long tunnel, so what would we be disambiguating for, exactly? I've never heard the term "Metro tunnel" used specifically for those two sections under rivers. Nor does the article provide any evidence that anyone else does, either. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:34, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
