Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monsters in Mahou Sentai Magiranger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 17:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Monsters in Mahou Sentai Magiranger

Monsters in Mahou Sentai Magiranger (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is a list of monsters that are not notable outside of the fictional universe. There is no real world context. Remember WP:NOT#DIR, and that Wikipedia is not an indescriminate collection of information. Additionally, there are no secondary sources to meet WP:FICT. Also, this is plot information only (WP:PLOT) Pilotbob 04:02, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep: Deleting an article is not the first response to bad content. Fix it first. All of this seems to be in response to the keep of another article in the same series. We do not delete articles because of WP:NOT. We fix them.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:06, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
    This article cannot meet WP:NOT. It has existed for almost a year and is still completely unsourced. I could not find coverage of this subject in any reliable secondary source so it does not meet WP:FICT. Additionally, it will never amount to anything but a guide to the fictional show (WP:NOT#GUIDE). If this article is rewritten, it still will not policy guidelines. Since reliable secondary sources do not exist, no amount of rewriting can make a difference. Explain how this article can be revised without still violating WP:NOT, WP:N, and WP:RS. I have nominated these articles because I believe fixing them is impossible Pilotbob 04:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
    On further review, this article is another one that I could see deleted and not affect its source article in any way. Merging would be pointless.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:32, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions. -- Pilotbob 04:08, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOT#PLOT. This is just a summary of the minor creatures in the fictional universe with no real-world context or analysis. It's doubtful reliable secondary sources exist to fix that problem or to establish notability per WP:FICT. Without such sources, this article cannot be "fixed". Doctorfluffy 19:07, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Note - user indefinitely blocked as disruptive sockpuppet. — xDanielx T/C 22:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. WP:NOT#PLOT and indiscriminate information. Crazysuit 06:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Deleting an article is not the first response to bad content, but if the content is terrible then it is sure to be deleted sooner or later. This article has no primary or secondary sources to demonstrate notability outside the Mahou Sentai Magiranger television series. Better to delete now. --Gavin Collins 20:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
No, if the content is terrible, then it's sure to be changed sooner or later. -Harmil 06:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep: Just needs to be reworked to remove excessive details and if possible I would like for this to be be Trans-Wikied to the Power Rangers Universe Wiki that has it's own Sentai section and is full of details that is no longer on Wikipedia and the Magiranger link is [1]. I would rather see this stuff Trans-wikied rather than deleted completely. -Adv193 22:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep or Merge: The article can be rewritten for conciseness, and be stuck back into Underground Hades Empire Infershia, where it was originally split off from.--Mr Fink 19:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  • delete per Doctorfluffy. A large article on the series seems appropriate, but having a "list of monsters" or "list of spells" seems almost as crufty as having an article on a "list of things that made Homer say 'doh!'". AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 02:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: That's right, we must delete this trivial article that's only useful to a few thousand people in order to save electrons. Remember, save those electrons, they're more important than you think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.139.148.100 (talk) 17:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.