Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monica Moment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete; closing early since consensus is clear. Nishkid64 (talk) 21:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Monica Moment
- An amusing hoax (I guess...). `'mikka 02:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete somebody's private joke, apparently. Possibly a stealth attack page on someone named Monica, but who knows? Unencyclopedic in any case. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:04, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Quite an elaborate hoax. Searching for the phrase on Google turns up information relating to the Clinton-Monica Lewinsky scandal, but that's it. With no sources, this should definitely be deleted. --Nehrams2020 04:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete There are obvious 'monica moments' to do with monica lewinsky, but it is at best clear WP:NEO violation.
- Delete thinly-veiled attack page. JuJube 04:53, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Hoax. Someone named Monica is known to her friends as being forgetful, so her friends refer to each other's forgetfulness as "having a Monica Moment". Croxley 05:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:V. Most people under 40 probably associate this phrase with moments of obsessive cleanliness per the character on Friends. This isn't funny enough for BJAODN, alas. --Dhartung | Talk 06:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Fairly gentle attack page. Note that it's the sole contribution of a single purpose account. BTLizard 09:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Hoax. ¿ςפקιДИτς! ☺ ☻ 14:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as hoax. —dima/talk/ 17:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete; hoax written all over it. Sr13 (T|C) 18:22, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete- mildy amusing- but a hoax all the same. Thunderwing 19:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete An entertaining hoax for a change but still a hoax. Seed 2.0 20:22, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.