Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moinuddin Aqeel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 20:39, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Moinuddin Aqeel

Moinuddin Aqeel (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No sources, notability not established. Delete. Jefferson Anderson 18:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 19:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. The articles on Yunus Hasni, Abul Lais Siddiqui, Sahar Ansari, and Moinuddin Aqeel are all equally short, unsourced, and so textually similar that it looks like they have been copied and pasted to each other. This scholar needs to be distinguished somehow from the other three in order to convince me that he is notable. —David Eppstein 20:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

• DO NOT DELETE. One should amend the articles or prescribe changes rather voting for the deletion. The text looks similar as the scholars are of a same field and the works they have done are almost similar. The scholars are noted in their fields and their entries should remain intact. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 221.132.113.214 (talk) 14:21, 14 April 2007 (UTC).
• Delete per nom. No publications? Arbustoo 07:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. I know that the scholar has 37 books published. Names are missing.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.132.113.214 (talk • contribs)
• Delete I don't see that these books alone establish notability without some demonstration of their impact. For example, Googling "Resurgence of Muslim Separatism in British India" generates 4 unique hits, all book vendors, no discussion of content. Moinuddin Aqeel would not qualify as a notable author, and I don't see that WP:PROF is met either. Article is unsourced. Pete.Hurd 20:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.