Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moidi language

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 13:55, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Moidi language

Vanity city again. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 03:30, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, non-notable conlang, vanity. Lacrimosus 05:47, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, conlang vanity. Megan1967 06:27, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Obvious delete. Conlangs aren't inherently notable. - Mustafaa 06:54, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. — JIP | Talk 08:08, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I feel we can be pretty confident that more people have voted to delete than have learnt the language... Average Earthman 12:21, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as nonnotable langcruft. Still I'm impressed that high school freshmen had the insight that verbal inflections can be separate from the verb. --Angr 06:48, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Gee, I thought I'd researched and learned about every conlang there was out there, but then this new one pops up. Invented by a high school freshman -- like many conlangs, yawn. Plus he gives his email address at the end of the article -- something to avoid in Wikipedia articles. And you know what's happened to all the Wikipedia articles that have included emails at the end in the past . . . they were deleted. Wiwaxia 09:41, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• delete - vanity language cruft. Fawcett5 22:11, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.