Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohgborr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -- Longhair\^talk 08:38, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mohgborr

Mohgborr (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Disputed prod. Prod tag read "Non-notable character in a game played by one club." Tag was removed with the comment "Deletion Proposal removed - Isn't this sort of article, and the thought behind it, what helped to spark Wikipedia to begin with?" I agree with the prod - Delete as not notable. Not a single Google hit. Dawn bard (talk) 22:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 22:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
• Dont Delete -- Please do not delete this article- as a member of the games club referenced on the page, it is here as an article to help our members and to spread ideas to others -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Superlative s (talk • contribs) 02:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

  Comment - I suggest you read what Wikipedia is not. Cheers! Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 02:30, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Indubitably non-notable. Anturiaethwr (talk) 22:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Completely fails WP:NOTE and WP:FICTION per this [1]. There is no verifiable information that could be used to construct a sound out-of-universe article for this character. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 22:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
• Am I reading this right? An article about a group's D&D experience with a focus on one of the characters? Delete; definitely no notability. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 23:26, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

• Strong delete we really don't need this Thinboy00 @027, i.e. 23:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
• Strong delete, the kind of nonsense that gives Wikipedia a bad name. No notability whatsoever. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 00:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

• Strong delete per my original PROD, fails WP:N ukexpat (talk) 00:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
• Strong delete per all above, particularly Jeremy McCracken. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:07, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
• Strongest of deletes garbage. Anonymous is absolutely mistaken about what Wikipedia is about too. Junk it, the sooner the better. JuJube (talk) 11:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
• Don't Delete It's just a page someone made for something they do. I don't think it should be deleted, as i'm sure the creator(s) seriously want this page up, and it won't bother anyone surfing Wikipedia, since unless they want to find a Mohgborr page, they're not going to find it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.19.36.10 (talk) 19:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

  Please see WP:NOHARM. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 19:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete not notable, no real potential of being so. Hobit (talk) 23:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. —Gavin Collins (talk) 07:53, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
• Strong delete It appears Mohgborr has been reanimated yet again, this time as a Wikipedia article. He really needs to be laid to rest, ASAP. Turn undead! Freederick (talk) 11:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NFT. Percy Snoodle (talk) 11:36, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Essentially, this is non-notable fiction passed off as an article in it's current format. Lawrence § t/e 17:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Characters from Gary Gygax's campaign might be notable, an NPC from someone non-notable's non-notable game is, well, not-notable. Edward321 (talk) 00:19, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.