Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamad Ibrahim Shnewer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 2007 Fort Dix attack plot. This article contains no contextual information not available in the target article and a merge seems unecessary. Arkyan • (talk) 21:44, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mohamad Ibrahim Shnewer

Mohamad Ibrahim Shnewer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article does not contain any notable information that is not already in 2007 Fort Dix attack plot. Keeping a stub for the future possibility of notability is not necessary. Remy B 12:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Merge and/or redirect to the article on the attack plot as a legitimate search term, and as a history placeholder in the event that he carves himself a significant place in longterm world events. -- saberwyn 12:10, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep of course, since 2007 Fort Dix attack plot is a notable incident. This article simply must be extended. This however, gives rise to another question. Do we need an article about every Guantanamo Bay detainee? See Category:Guantanamo_Bay_detainees. Most of the are indeed non-notable, unlike this man. So, what do you think?Biophys 00:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
If you believe any of the pages are not notable enough, be bold and nominate them for deletion. =) Jumping cheese Cont@ct 23:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
I do not think that a person is notable just for the fact that they are involved in a notable event. For the person to warrant an article of their own, there must be additional notability, which this article does not establish. As for the notability of unrelated articles - this is not the place to discuss it - please take it up elsewhere. Remy B 02:51, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect—by my assessment, this man is only notable in the context of the attack plot. GracenotesT § 01:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge Not notable enough outside of the attack plot. Jumping cheese Cont@ct 23:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect The subject of the article is only notable in the context of the Fort Dix attack plot. There is no sense in having information duplicated in several places which will then diverge, as we've seen happen with other needless forks. It just confuses things and reduces the quality of Wikipedia. --Monotonehell 19:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.