Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Model Warship Combat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep - CrazyRussian talk/email 12:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Model Warship Combat

WP:V - CrazyRussian talk/email 00:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Withdrawn. - CrazyRussian talk/email 12:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep I'm undecided about NABGO, but the general article on this should stay. It does seem to be a hobby with many clubs and societies in several countries. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep seems to be a valid, international hobby. But move to Model warship combat --Steve 01:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep A google search turns up MANY websites devoted to this hobby. I am not that interested in this hobby, but it doesn't make it non-notable. Definately keepable. --Jayron32 03:49, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • 423,000 hits on Google. Looks like a keeper to me. Nephron  T|C 04:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Technical comment: That would be 5,480 Google hits only.[1] You have to use the exact term, not every website which uses the three words anywhere in the text without much of a relation.Fram 11:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, but 1) sources will have to be added, and 2) remove the specific group links as they wouldn't pass WP:EL. ColourBurst 05:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep but move per Steve. I'm not 100% certain this is the best name but it's descriptive enough. Backlink to miniature wargaming needed, too. --Dhartung | Talk 08:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep What made anyone think this was a candidate for deletion? Over anxious deleter. --Ughmonster 09:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep - Doesn't seem to be notable, but keep it for now. Let the editor provide more sources and add more matter --NRS | T/M\B 12:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.