Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mochila

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Thryduulf 14:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mochila

And more corporate spam. Can we get a speedy tag for corporate spam? NawlinWiki 18:25, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and that's a good idea for a speedy tag Deleuze 18:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:34, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - By leveraging the power of the internet!!!!!! Wickethewok 19:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. See the news coverage listed under external links, and take a look at their owners[1] and list of customers[2]. This is exactly why there should not be a speedy tag for perceived spam. This company is notable, but its article might have been deleted if I hadn't found links for some press coverage. TruthbringerToronto 00:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Speedy Delete as corporate spam after reading TruthbringerToronto's backup evidence. Speedy Tag for Corporate Spam is an excellent idea - isn't there one already Bwithh 02:10, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - non-notable and full of unsourced corporate spiel. BlueValour 23:24, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.