Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mo v t

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted, CSD-A1. ➨ ЯЄDVERS 22:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mo v t

This could be a dicdef at best if it was remotely notable. The speedy tag was removed, hence the listing here. Kevin 12:56, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete The article admits it's a non-notable neologism. Cut it out of our fine encyclopaedia. WilyD 13:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Fram 14:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete neologism that looks odd. Helicoptor 15:25, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete motivated by non-notability and neologistic nature. -- Slowmover 15:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. Nationalparks 17:44, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Under which criterion? ➨ ЯЄDVERS 19:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

• A1, as per Kevin1243's orginal speedy tags, and under G1, as it is pretty much {{nonsense}}: "This article provides no meaningful content". Nationalparks 21:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

• Doesn't quite qualify under G1 - it isn't patent nonsense - but A1 covers it. When requesting an AFD'd article be speedy deleted, please always give a reason as listed in the criteria. It really helps! ➨ ЯЄDVERS 22:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.