Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mjolnir Battle Tactics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 23:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mjolnir Battle Tactics

This is a pure vanity article. It contains information about a closed community that is of no use to anyone else. This is also simply a continuation of a petty "war" MBT have with another group in the closed community, which exists purely to gain the most members, and as such is nothing more than vain advertising. (apologies for multiple edits, i'm new) Elmicker 03:02, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

I wish for this article to be deleted. It is no more than ads. --Hotshotesquire 03:55, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Agreed, the group in question has a history of similar behavior on bungie.net as well. As a moderator of Bungie.net, I do not wish to see a reputation built against Bungie.net for this group's actions. The article so far violates the NPOV rule, the No Original Research rule, and the No Advertisment rule. GameJunkieJim 03:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Vanity advertisement for a recently-created Halo straegy community. --NeoChaosX (talk | contribs) 04:32, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanity Konman72 04:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — as per above Betacommand 05:21, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. -- Gogo Dodo 05:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Do I absolutely have to say as per above? Wait, nevermind. I just did. This sucks. --65.31.150.139 07:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete on the basis of a lack of notability. Sijo Ripa 17:49, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Is a pure advertisement. firepenguinz 19:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment HI FIREPENQUINZ!!!! And to be on topic, I agree with what he said. --65.31.150.139 06:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn, WP:VAIN, WP:SPAM... that enough? --Svartalf 02:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. — Gosgood 01:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.