Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misty Anderson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect to Kate's Playground. This article has absolutely no content to merge, even post-AfD. --Deathphoenix 00:30, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Misty Anderson

A Google search indicates that this person is the model at an adult content website with an Alexa rating over 200,000.[1] I was very tempted to speedy this but was unsure if it qualified under criteria A7 (non-notable person). --Allen3 ^talk 01:02, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Comment - the Google search also turned up a lot more pages than her own for the same model (apparently), at least the first 50 or so. She seems to be prolific, but the article, as it is, isn't even a stub. I'm witholding my vote for a couple days, and if one of her fans can flesh it out with meaningful content, it might be worth keeping. If that doesn't happen, though... - dharmabum (talk) 01:08, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete - Popular model with who? Victoria's Secret? Women's magazines? Music videos? The article doesn't say. Ruby 02:18, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but only if expanded suitably. Kate's Playground survived an AFD and this individual is part of that contingent of models. 23skidoo 05:47, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and immeidate expansion per 23skidoo. --Terence Ong 16:17, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - even if the site she appears on is notable, she herself is obviously not, and fails WP:BIO by a wide margin. 23skidoo's argument could be taken to call for the inclusion of, say, everyone who writes for a particular newspaper that's covered in the encyclopedia, or every member of a particular orchestra; it seems to me this is not a precident we should be setting. - squibix 16:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per Ruby. Kusma (討論) 18:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Kate's Playground Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 23:11, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Kate's Playground per JzG. --W.marsh 00:57, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete TestPilot 01:34, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Kate's Playground.--ThreeAnswers 18:26, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge Could not actually wade through all the dense information here, but merge can what can be salvaged. Eusebeus 20:50, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Kate's Playground, that seems sensible. - dharmabum (talk) 01:18, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Kate's Playground, or delete. Ronabop 07:23, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.