Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mistress Ching

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mistress Ching

Mistress Ching (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Is this fictional character really notable enough for an article? I don't think so. Make her walk the plank -- I mean, delete. --Nlu (talk) 18:37, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - Not notable enough to warrant an article Corpx 18:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per notabality --St.daniel Talk 19:34, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Who? Absolutely no sources. DarkAudit 20:04, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Non notable fictional character; no verificable references. 65.241.15.131 21:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
  • I think this information was taken from here or a similar site. Delete, because the brief mention in the Brethren of the Coast article is probably sufficient. The articles on Capitaine Chevalle, Ammand The Corsair, and Sri Sumbhajee should also be deleted because there is no reason to believe that these characters are going to make more than a brief cameo in At World's End. Of the "nine pirate lords" described in official literature, only Jack Sparrow, Hector Barbossa, and Sao Feng really need articles of their own. The rest should be covered briefly in Brethren of the Coast. *** Crotalus *** 21:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Hardly a notable enough character to warrant its own article. There should only be one page listing the Pirate Lords, including Mistress Ching, Capitaine Chevalle, etc. PNW Raven
    • Comment The one that does exist is also up for deletion. The text for the secondary characters is identical between the individual articles and the big one. The other three cited above have now been placed in AfD status. DarkAudit 14:48, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.