Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mistakism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:37, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mistakism

Mistakism (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This appears to be an attempt to coin a neologism/new art movement. Several Ghits, all to self-published sources, most of which are obvious attempts to coin the term. I can't find any reliable secondary sources using the term. Non-notable. Coren 18:58, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, will do! --164.107.223.217 00:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment This anonymous user has voted Keep in every AfD he's voted in. JuJube 00:20, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
So what? If I find one that I agree should be deleted, I promise that I will vote as such, but if I have a reason to keep, why not share it? Should I comment that you mostly vote to delete articles based on your recent history as evidence of something? --164.107.223.217 00:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as protologism. EALacey 21:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, the nom has this one dead on and I'd only be repeating them. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete whole lotta hoopla. JuJube 23:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.