Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missjackie69

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:05, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Missjackie69

Subject of dubious notability (36 unique GHits for "Missjackie69", most of which appear irrelevant, and none at all for "Jackie Butorsky" -- not a good sign of notability for a supposed "internet celebrity"), and probably impossible to verify many of the assertions in the article. Only claims to fame are having one of her videos played on VH1 alongside other momentary internet funnies, having been on Jenny Jones, and having met some actual celebrities. Was tagged for speedy, was detagged by someone else, so decided to open it up for AfD debate. ~ Matticus78 20:44, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

On the internet she goes only by the name Missjackie, her real name was included for completeness. Also, what "assertations" need to be verified? Perhaps some on here will argue she isn't a "true" celebrity... she doesn't have her own show like Andy Milonakis, but what is the minimum amount of fame to classify someone with that term? Her videos on Youtube have been viewed over 280,000 times and are quite popular. Maybe you should have a look there. I suppose you are free to do whatever you want on here. Oh well. --Bwd234 23:53, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. I placed the original speedy tag. Posting a few funny clips on the web and having one played on a VH1 clip show, to me, is not evidence of notability. Nuttah68 20:56, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn vanity. 'most worthless piece of viewer mail they received that week' is not a claim to notability IMO. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 22:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Naconkantari 22:59, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete because who cares. Danny Lilithborne 01:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not I. RFerreira 03:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The Wikipedia article on Web Junk 20 even has her name mentioned in it. I see no reason not to leave her page up! --Bwd234 15:18, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Only edits are related to Missjackie69 article. Danny Lilithborne 00:44, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for all reasons stated above. Chad1m 04:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.