Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missing leg syndrome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 11:57, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Missing leg syndrome

This is nonsense. RickK 06:40, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep. This article does have an element of truth. If it weren't for deletion, there could be a lot more than the humongous 746,146 articles on Wikipedia - possibly one and a half million. Scott Gall 06:47, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
    • You really believe cats have magical powers? RickK 06:49, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
    • ... and that's exactly why we have deletion. Delete this silly piece. Radiant! 09:27, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete unless verification is provided. Gazpacho 07:41, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. There are no notable references. The phrase "Many theorize that cats possess magical powers unknown to the rest of the world" lowers its credibility. Zzyzx11 07:48, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, neologism, speculation. Strange the way their legs do that though. Kappa 09:30, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Remove that catastrophe. Megan1967 09:39, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Suggest merge at Talk:Cat. While the name and the magic bit are obviously hoaxy, I heard about such a thing too. Let the people at the cat article sort it out and add it if it's verified and notable. No need for a seperate article. Mgm|(talk) 10:13, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Zero hits at Google for "missing leg syndrome" cats, and there are a godzillion cat lover pages out there. If one hasn't picked this one up yet, it's a neologism. HyperZonktalk 16:57, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as above. – flamurai (t) 17:29, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
  • Hello, this should be speedily deleted as patent nonsense / disruption of Wikipedia. Even listing it on VfD is a colossal waste of time. DreamGuy 02:55, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete, blatant nonsense. And, yes, this deserves a BJAODN mention. Meow. vlad_mv 04:45, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Rossami (talk) 05:35, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete or redirect to phantom limb. --Carnildo 06:27, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete No verification -- Longhair 14:08, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete or maybe redirect to phantom limb. -Sean Curtin 17:23, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)
  • Patent nonsense, a BJAODN candidate. Delete. - 195.113.20.20 17:13, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. This shouldn't redirect to phantom limb because it's not related to phantom limb . —Brim 05:01, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. ComCat 08:32, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.