Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Universe Organization

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was nomination withdrawn -- Francs2000 | Talk 14:47, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Miss Universe Organization

There is already a Miss Universe. Antonio Miss Universe Martin

• AntonioMartin (talk · contribs) has placed {{merge}} tags on the article [1], listed it at Wikipedia:Duplicate articles [2], and obviously wants the article merged. Antonio, if you want an article merged, merge it! See User talk:Mito#Miss_Universe, too. Merging doesn't involve deletion, at any stage. Only come here to Wikipedia:Votes for deletion if you want an administrator to actually delete an article, which in this case is clearly not so.

  Nominator is not being bold enough. Rescind nomination so that the nominator can immediately be bolder and get on with doing the merge that xe wants. Uncle G 11:57:09, 2005-07-26 (UTC)

• Comment no need for VfD, as per Uncle G.-Poli (talk • contribs) 13:45, 2005 July 26 (UTC)

Well, yeah, the idea was originally to merge the article, but, an unsigned person made me think about that because the person said that the Miss Universe Organization article is very inaccurate, and I think it actually is. A merge is a very soluble solution but I don't know exactly how much can be merged from the Miss Universe Organization article, and under what name should we merge it. Both Miss Universe and Miss Universe Organization are real good names, although I myself think , well, Miss Universe is more popular, but then again, the bone behind it is the organization so the name would be a tossup I guess. As for not being bold, just check me out Friday nights at Applebees when the waitresses ask me to strip dance on the table!!! LOL!!!! (I only go up to my underwear, for lawmakers) LOL.-Antonio Lightly Taking It Martin

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.