Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirrorthrone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete - there is significant and ubstantial enough disagreement in relation to the deletion of the article. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 09:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mirrorthrone

Mirrorthrone (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Of Wind and Weeping (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Carriers of Dust (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

One man band that does not meet the WP:MUSIC notability guideline. Also nominated are the band's two albums. Delete as nom. Michael Greiner 23:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete all: Non-notable band, albums. - Rjd0060 00:39, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Up and coming band, fairly well known in the metal underground. *Keep all Scipo 03:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

• • User:Scipo has few or no edits outside this subject. Stifle (talk) 21:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all per WP:NMG. Stifle (talk) 21:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep as per User:Scipo. They are considered a notable example of avant-garde metal in most metal circles. Cassandra Leo 21:37, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
• I'm going to have to say keep in accordance with Scipo and Cassandra Leo and because Mirrorthrone has around 30,000 hits on Google. Dalkaen 04:43, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep as their releases are very sought after in the avant-garde metal community. Varalf 8:21, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- --Rrburke^(talk) 02:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
• Comment I Like It is not a valid keep criteria. --Michael Greiner 10:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep all. Per WP:Music #1, has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable. I've added some. ♫ Cricket02 18:37, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete The added sources are webzines and forums, not reliable. Doesn't appear to meet WP:MUSIC. Toohool 01:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Comment: Since when are webzines not reliable? And which one is a forum? ♫ Cricket02 02:36, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.