Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mircobowling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mircobowling

Mircobowling (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non-notable/unattributable neologism. Zero G-Hits. Leuko 08:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

• Might be a typo for "microbowling", but that search term doesn't turn up anything relevant either. Delete per WP:NEO unless sources are found. —Celithemis 12:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete 'neologism' is putting it nicely. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. "and there for is a advantage" - that's why it's not a good idea to create articles when you're stoned! Croxley 23:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
  • ...That and the fact that they misspelled the article title. Wavy G 01:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Could have been nominated for speedy, clearly inappropriate. WP:NOT a dictionary of pot-smoking slang. CMummert · talk 15:02, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I would have loved to. Unfortunately, an admin took a narrow view of the CSD criteria, and neglected WP:IAR and WP:SNOW. Leuko 16:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.