The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 18:00, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
NN, vanity. 82 Google hits! Moe Aboulkheir 14:50, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete less than 90 ghits for a porn subject? That is below the level of invisibility. Oh, and the article is uncited, the bio details are minimal and speculative at that, and the tone is promotionaland sounds like WP:OR. Just zis Guy you know? 15:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete as being way below notability... even with the porn-bias of the Internet, she still scores badly. ---J.S (t|c) 16:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.