Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minnie Gertrude Matthews 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 07:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Minnie Gertrude Matthews

Minnie Gertrude Matthews (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I had originally deleted this speedily as CSD A7-- not notable bio. Then I saw where it had survived a prior VfD. Dlohcierekim 18:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete – God bless her, but not even sure of the date of her death! This does not lend itself to the case of Notability. More so to the fact, that no one may have cared. Sorry. ShoesssS ^Talk 18:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Sorry I missed the very old VfD. Even if we had proper sourcing, she certainly isn't notable by current standards, based on the article contents. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
• Weak delete: Being the oldest person in a particular place isn't quite up to notability standards, I'm afraid...... Dendodge .. Talk^Help 19:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, oldest person of a mid-sized city isn't notability. Prior articles on supercentenarians (sp?) have been deleted without full sourcing and those are people with claims to being the oldest in a particular country. --Dhartung | Talk 20:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete As per previous comments. Sorry, Minnie. Ecoleetage (talk) 03:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable WP:BIO; Google reveals many Wikipedia mirrors. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 04:18, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.