Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mine closure planning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 14:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mine closure planning

delete original research tag since november. Melaen 16:00, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

• clean-up although no-one has done it, I imagine that an article on the mine closure planning process could exist. MLA 16:04, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. A referenced (not well-referenced, but referenced) article without conspicuous POV problems that deals with a legitmate subject. Deleting article of substance for being in bad form is unencyclopedic behavior. Monicasdude 16:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ardenn 20:05, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, it has a reference, seems unlikely to be pure original research. Kappa 02:56, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. could be better referenced. -- Vansig 22:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.