Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MindTree (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 20:17, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] MindTree

Tagged as repost but not actually a repost, a new article about the same firm. Looks like a great place to work, bit dies that make tem notable? Looks a bit spammy, too. Has been dleeted more tan once at various places but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MindTree and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MindTree Consulting seems to be the most relevant past AfD. No awards in the article back then. That's about all that's changed. Just zis Guy you know? 23:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as advertising. Also, they use the phrase "human capital development." Brian G. Crawford 23:48, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete: it wasn't notable in the past, and nothing has changed. --Hetar 03:41, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete It's a repost in all meaningful ways. If you check the history, it had a AfD template that linked to one of the AfDs for another incarnation of this article (the one closed with a "delete" consensus on April 21st), but was bundled with that AfD incorrectly, thus escaping its rightful deletion. --Icarus 05:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable company. jni 07:08, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.