Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimio
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was nomination withdrawn (keep). Mailer Diablo 07:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mimio
WP:NOT advertising Amcfreely 08:33, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination. Week keep now that the article has been cleaned up some. Amcfreely 05:36, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Adspam. --Kinu 08:40, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete advertising, nothing else. (aeropagitica) 13:58, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep with NPOV rewrite. Google search ("mimio xi") reveals 59,000 hits all apparently to this product. --Fuhghettaboutit 15:50, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- I rewrote the product overview, removed all of the advertising text, stub tagged, etc.; maybe this will make the decision here easier. --Fuhghettaboutit 16:07, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- If this article results in a keep, it should be moved to Mimio Xi. I will not do so now as I imagine this would bollox up the afd linkages. --Fuhghettaboutit 16:14, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- User:Alexwcovington's cleanup (noted below) clarifies that it is a series of devices; should not be moved as I previously asserted. --Fuhghettaboutit 18:40, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- If this article results in a keep, it should be moved to Mimio Xi. I will not do so now as I imagine this would bollox up the afd linkages. --Fuhghettaboutit 16:14, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- I rewrote the product overview, removed all of the advertising text, stub tagged, etc.; maybe this will make the decision here easier. --Fuhghettaboutit 16:07, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - this device is somewhat common in office environments. There have been a range of these devices dating back at least through the mid-90s of which the Xi is only the latest. I've improved the article. --AlexWCovington (talk) 17:06, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep, but clean-up. Agree with notability. The article itself could still use a bit of work. -- Karnesky 18:03, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.