Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimbulus mimbletonia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge. Exactly to where doesn't need afd to decide. I'm going to tag it with Wizarding world just to put something on it, editors can decide. Petros471 17:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mimbulus mimbletonia

  • Delete. I do not believe that the article in question is sufficiently notable to merit inclusion in Wikipedia. — Mike • 04:03, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • *sigh* Delete, per nom and per my comment on Gurg. --Coredesat 10:20, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge to Neville Longbottom. Hasn't played a sufficient role in the series to warrant its own article, but is useful in context to Neville. - Mgm|(talk) 10:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge per MGM. Interlingua talk 13:45, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with a new section in Wizarding world titled "Plants" (maybe right after "Medicine"). There are no Harry Potter articles that contain plants, but I think this would be a good place to put it. --Deathphoenix ʕ 14:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --->|Newyorktimescrossword 22:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC)|
  • Merge per above comments. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:06, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge per Deathphoenix. A "Plants" section would be worth having - there are plenty. Tobelia 08:41, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge per either Mgm or Deathphoenix. No preference for which except that Neville Longbottom already exists. -- Northenglish (talk) -- 16:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect - either of the article above will do, can get a mention in both but it does ot need an article. Redirect is significantly better than delete in that it prevents the recreation of the article. Dalf | Talk 01:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.