Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milton Keynes in popular culture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 is almost Singularity 04:10, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Milton Keynes in popular culture

Milton Keynes in popular culture (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Again, a collection of bad WP:TRIVIA Bulldog123 04:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete WP:TRIVIA and unreferenced. ~ Wikihermit 04:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:TRIVIA. Oysterguitarist 06:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as perhaps the worst of these sorts of articles it has been my displeasure to encounter. Otto4711 12:11, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I hived it off from the original Milton Keynes article as being substantially non-notable and clogging up a long article. It has no redeeming merit. --Concrete Cowboy 12:23, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as Original Research. —gorgan_almighty 14:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • pointless comment when I first saw this, I thought it was about Milton Friedman and John Maynard Keynes in popular culture. Can you imagine? --JayHenry 14:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It's Milton Keynes. Milton Keynes. What's next, Skelmersdale in popular culture? Will (talk) 17:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Casperonline 20:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as trivial listcruft. VanTucky (talk) 00:04, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as explained in various AFD's related to IPC, unsourced, listcruft, trivia-filled.--JForget 01:42, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete we need not double our number of articles by creating an X in popular culture from each X. Carlossuarez46 21:27, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge Okay, so it's Jolly Old Levittown. Put it back in the main article and leave it there. Mandsford 17:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Sorry, even I'm not defending this one. AndyJones 17:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per AndyJones. Bearian 18:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.