Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millstone (collectible card)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. PeaceNT 04:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Millstone (collectible card)

Millstone (collectible card) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Even as a Magic player myself, I hardly think it is necessary for a single card to have its own article. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminant collection of information, and the article only weakly asserts the notability of this particular card. Also, the article consists mostly of unnecessary statistical information about the card: Wikipedia is not a game guide. Finally, the article appears to have a quote from some source, but it is not attributed. Is this from a reliable source? Charlie 08:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Delete- I agree with the reason for deletion. Alphablast 13:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete I know "gamecruft" gets thrown around here on AfD a lot, but this actually does qualify. Not notable enough for it's own article and there's not enough information to make one anyway, but probably should see mention in an article on M:tG play. Cheers, Lanky (YELL) 14:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Delete -- Yes, Wikipedia sometimes has relatively trivial entries, but oh, come ON. If someone wants to do an entire article on all collectible, rare, or valuable Magic cards that's one thing. This is just silly. Artemis-Arethusa 15:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. This article is more suited for the M:tG Wiki, if it exists. Here, the article is just fancruft. AgentPeppermint 16:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.