Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millsite canyon trail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete — Caknuck (talk) 07:32, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Millsite canyon trail

Millsite canyon trail (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

not notable, author ignored advert tag Adimovk5 (talk) 02:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

recommend Millsite canyon trail for deletion

• This article reads like an advertisement and was previously marked {{advert}}

 23:22, 28 October 2007 User:VivioFateFan (→Ad style article)

• The author removed an {{advert}} tag without attempting a fix and without explanation

 00:05, 29 October 2007 User:Ikanode (1,641 bytes)  

• No article links to this article
• This article links to no other article
• Two of the three external links provided require are for the same members only, registratiion required website
• The one functioning external link contains only photos
• This article does not give sources for anything in the article body
• Nothing is notable about the article's 12.7 miles of trail in a 900 mile trail system in Tonto National Forest which does not mention this trail

Tonto National Forest has an article which does not mention this trail

• Google links for "Millsite Canyon Trail" point either to this article or to the previously mentioned members only website-----Adimovk5 (talk) 02:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, especially the bit about the source with just pics. Ryan4314 (talk) 03:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete due to insufficient notability: no independent reliable sources found. I haven't reviewed the Tonto National Forest article to determine whether any of this should be merged to there, but certainly "They could have filmed Lord of the Rings here" doesn't qualify, nor the "It is not known whether..." stuff. I'm a trail lover, but if the natural bridge and "wall" are noted in reliable sources, they should be mentioned in the parent article, and the trail should be mentioned only as a part of the trail system and as the access to these features. Barno (talk) 19:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.