Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milliteq

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 00:31, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Milliteq

This is a non-notable and very possibly a joke article. Google search returns one unrelated hit. D. Wu 04:38, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

  • Maybe change I think you should write something in about Milliteq Word when it comes out, rather than this. BTW, i make EnSpireMe, but all I use Gigateq for is to make my programs look better. I see mine as just a fake name. (MPN)
  • Delete Hoax. One man coprporation, and a 14 yr old CEO? Go to bed! Hamster Sandwich 05:12, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep Yes i'm 14 and it's a one man operation, i can't afford workers. I am the only worker so what, I still make programs and i will have one out soon. And if that program happens to be in google, and Milliteq too, can i come back then? brendan williams 1:48, 7 August 2005
Comment: Unsigned comment above added by 71.241.120.68 -- Longhair | Talk 06:48, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
    • If you have a company thats notable you have to actually move beyond the developmental stage of your operations, remember Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Thats not to say you shouldn't have an article here in the future. Generally speaking, it is better to have the notability as a company, or as an individual that other people who aren't your friends, family members (or particularly yourself) would want to write about or read a story about you and/or Milliteq. I happen to know a guy who owns a company called Millitex and he does a great business. Drives a sweet Porche. They do special paint jobs for military vehicles. And I doubt he'd get an article here in the Wikipedia as you can see by the red link (like this one) on his company name. You have to establish real notability or notariety to get an article in. Try editing about a subject you have a real interest in, maybe you can contribute something positive to the knowledge base here. Good luck with your company BTW, I hope you do make it big enough to get in here someday! If you establish a user page I could have discussed all this with you in that space. Just one of the benifits of creating a wikipedia account. See you 'round! Hamster Sandwich 07:08, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep i am his friend Justin and i don't see ANYTHING wrong with it 1:52, 7 August 2005
Comment: Unsigned comment above added by 71.241.120.68 -- Longhair | Talk 06:48, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
  • speedy keep what's wrong with it, the company IS real, 14 year old CEO or not. Robert 1:53, 7 August 2005
Comment: Unsigned comment above added by 71.241.120.68 -- Longhair | Talk 06:48, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep When Milliteq Word is released on a website i'm sure i will get noted in google. brendan williams 2:18 UTC 7 August 2005
Comment: Unsigned comment above added by 71.241.120.68 -- Longhair | Talk 06:48, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete -- vanity - Longhair | Talk 06:44, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Much linguists study language as it 'is' used rather than simply recording and enforcing "correct" usage, Wikipedia is a record of what 'has' occurred and influenced the world at large. Good luck with your fame &/or fortune. Eldereft 07:16, 7 August 2005 (UTC).
  • Weak Delete. Ok then so someday I CAN be in here but just when it (My company) does come successful? and how is it vanity? And does the subject have to be VERY popular to get in here? Brendan Williams 3:33 AM ET 7 Aug 2005
Comment: Forget about adding your own entry. See Wikipedia:Vanity. If and when you become notable enough, hopefully somebody will notice and add it for you ;) -- Longhair | Talk 07:40, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
Question: What is a User Page? Brendan Williams | Talk
Comment: See your talk page for my reply. -- Longhair | Talk 07:58, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete either total hoax or hopelessly obscure (nothing on Google at all), and the sockpuppets certainly don't help. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 08:00, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - obvious complete joke hoax. FCYTravis 08:24, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. ManoaChild 09:18, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - Vanity Tonywalton 09:29, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, and Brendan, try not to be upset about it. I don't have a wikipedia page, either. Good luck with your business! =) Xaa 10:03, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
Comment: Sure you do Xaa, it's just in the other namespace :) -- Longhair | Talk 10:05, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.