Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millie and Monkey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 04:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Millie and Monkey
The article fails to state why this cartoon strip is notable. Google gives no hits whatsoever for its name. It also gives no hits whatsoever for the magazine it is supposed to be "currently appearing in". I did manage to find the webpage of what looks like its alleged creator, here, and it has an up-to-date CV etc., but there's no mention of the comic nor the magazine. If the cartoon strip exists, along with the magazine, then there appears to be no evidence anyone has seen it apart from its creator. In a nutshell: it's about as non-notable as a cartoon gets, but the speedy deletion guidelines don't cover comics, so that request was knocked back. Should also note that the page has already been speedily deleted once (3 Sep) and has been recreated. Thomjakobsen 01:39, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I also checked out Hat Day Designs, which is run by Roberts. Nothing there, either. Even if there were, I'm not entirely certain this would meet with notability standards.--Sethacus 02:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unless significant coverage from reliable, independent sources are found Corpx 04:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete; non-notable, unverifiable. Masaruemoto 04:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 04:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, does not assert any notability. JIP | Talk 07:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:V. -- GarbageCollection - !Collect 12:09, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
