The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox 11:15, 28 May '06
Delete Not bad enough nor good enough for BJAODN. -- Kicking222 17:36, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. A bit lame for BJAODN. DarthVader 22:59, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.