Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mill centre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Use by one group does not make the use of a term widespread - and certainly not notable. Pastordavid (talk) 17:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mill centre

Mill centre (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

PROD tag removed by IP so here we are. Neologism that lacks any indication of notability. In addition, Wikipedia is not a dictionary of slang words. (Also see related discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mill(insult)) —Travis^talk 22:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Karanacs (talk) 22:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Article directly notes its own link to Mill(insult), which is up for AFD, per the nom's note. We aren't Urban Dictionary. --Dennis The Mill (Rawr and stuff) 22:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - If the article is accurate (which I do not know), it could be notable. Part of the problem is that the article on The Prince's Trust is a poor one, in that it does not set out much of the work that the Trust is involved in. If the term is in use, it probably ought to be transwikified to the doctionary. On the other hand Mill(insult) should certainly be deleted. That article is almost word for word idetnical to this one. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.