Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miles Smith

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedied by Longhair. Closing. Essjay · Talk 07:09, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Miles Smith

Delete: the formula is patent nonsense, 0 google hits, and evidently a joke. I tagged it for speedy deletion, but evidently a VfD is needed... Raistlin 15:02, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

Delete as above. Possible vanity/OR, even? Grayum 15:21, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy delete. as above. --Sleepyhead81 15:23, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Plutonium will last longer than this article I predict. Capitalistroadster 16:06, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unless references added to article before end of VfD. JYolkowski // talk 16:10, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as a hoax. -- BD2412 ^talk 18:29, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nonsense. -- 19:21, August 13, 2005 (UTC)\
• Delete -- Longhair | Talk 19:45, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This is a hoax. 33.2.3²334339 is not a number. The thing that is written there is not an equation (look at it). If the closer really wants to play safe, drop a note at Dr. Michael Hardy's place. MIT mathematics prof until recently.—Encephalon | ζ | Σ 21:06:19, 2005-08-13 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - I don't know why this was marked as not a candidate for speedy delete. It has no plausible grounds for notability and is patent nonsense even to the untrained eye. I could create a vanity page and claim that I had invented a nonsensical chemical formula and it wouldn't be any less deserving of speedy delete.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.