Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mile High Music

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --- Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 18:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mile High Music

Mile High Music (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

NN "DIY" record label. Lots of ghits for "mile high music", but not this company. Plus, their website was mostly broken when I looked at it. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 11:15, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

The Mile High Music website is currently being totally rebuilt, but due to an impending release, we couldn't afford to have it completely off-line, hence the fact that alot of the links are currently not working. I will have it 100% over the coming 2 weeks or so, and if you do actually check the 'buy now' links, they will confirm that we are indeed a fully functioning record label, as you can see on iTunes, Amazon and our distributors Cargo Records. We are DIY and so have to do it all ourselves, there isn't a crack web team, so I have to do things as I have tiem. We, unlike Snakes & Ladders Records - who aren't a company but seem to be excepted by Wiki - have had multiple releases through various sources and will continue to put out albums over the coming year, all of which will be available worldwide through the mentioned sources. If it is purely down to our site having some temporary holes, can you please hold fire on deletion for a week or so, when it will be fully up and running. Please otherwise let me know what needs to be done to keep the page on Wiki. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MandrakeMan (talk • contribs) 18:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

p.s. I have just added the 1st artist bio to the new site for Zen, a band who had releases through MHM from 1995 onward. Others to be added shortly. I will also add all the press reviews from over the years when I have a moment, they will also substantiate the life of the label. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MandrakeMan (talk • contribs) 18:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Further to previous, this very evening 20/03/08, I have added biogs to all the artists on the website with relevant info, release details and links. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MandrakeMan (talk • contribs) 22:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment. All of the things that you have added or will add only verify that the company exists, not that it is a notable one. Please see WP:CORP for criteria of notable companies. ... discospinster talk 18:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

230308 - For a start, the New Cross compilations were funded - in part - by Lewisham Council in South London, as they were examples of the community of songwriters and artists in the area. They were very successful, hence the second one, both charting on NME & Rough Trade polls for compilations. That in indie terms is 'notable'. We have been approached to do more by many many artists and have been offered funding but for now we want to focus on getting some very well known - on the South London scene - songwriters albums out. If you could please look at the entry for Snakes & Ladders Records which seems to be ok according to Wiki, but isn't a company, they are a great bunch but... please can you explain the difference as to why they aren't getting hassled and I am! Thanks.

  • Comment MandrakeMan - I've left a note on your talk page hopefully providing a response to your questions/concerns and a bit more information on the process. Richc80 (talk) 16:57, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:CORP Richc80 (talk) 03:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hersfold (t/a/c) 05:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable. Nothing on google other than the label's website, and they're not big enough to be listed on allmusic.com as a record label. JeremyMcCracken (talk) 05:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Notability not established per WP:CORP.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 06:54, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, not yet notable per WP:CORP. Article can be recreated if and when they begin to meet those criteria. Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:44, 5 April 2008 (UTC).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.