The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus, keep. Johnleemk | Talk 08:37, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
Likely vanity. Term gets 143 google hits [1]. Interiot 10:19, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Hmm, difficult, very difficult... but I'm going to have to go with a borderline delete. While their products have been reviewed in audio magazines, it's very much a niche product. Perhaps they could get a mention on a page about vacuum tubes? — RJH 23:42, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Keep It looks to be an established company Sethie 23:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.