Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milano (cookie)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yummy! :) - Mailer Diablo 16:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Milano (cookie)

A consensus was reached at DRV to overturn the speedy deletion of this article [1]. This is a procedural nomination so I abstain. Thryduulf 15:45, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Strong keep as a highly known dessert snack from a well-known company. --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Then you should easily be able to make a proper argument, citing sources, demonstrating that this product satisfies the WP:CORP criteria for products. Uncle G 17:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep [2] 60$ million in sales is enough for me, and that was in 1998. Where it is now? I don't know, but even if it was zero, that's still a keepable value to me. And if that ain't a good enough source, well, it should at least indicate that there are potentially better ones out there. FrozenPurpleCube 20:44, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
    • or if you really want, you could buy [3], but personally 3 grand is a little rich for my blood. FrozenPurpleCube 20:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep. Meets the requirements for product notability. Original speedy was nonsense.Cynical 22:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge- Merge all into a list of Pepperridge farm cookies/bicuits. bibliomaniac15 23:22, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per the comments above. RFerreira 01:17, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep as per Badlydrawjeff. EvilCouch 12:22, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.