Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Woodard (politician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:39, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mike Woodard (politician)

Mike Woodard (politician) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article was proposed for deletion but had previously been proposed for deletion and recreated so not eligable for prod. Reason for deletion was 'City councilmen fails WP:BIO' Davewild (talk) 18:14, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - per nom. Hammer1980·^talk 18:20, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete given the absence of secondary sources for notability. --Dhartung | Talk 18:22, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Too minor an official for inclusion. scope_creep (talk) 18:37, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.   jj137 (Talk) 22:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete council officials are not notable. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 01:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Council officials are not inherently non-notable, they're just not inherently notable. Since this article doesn't include any secondary sources, I vote delete, with no prejudice against recreation of such sources can be found. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarcasticidealist (talk • contribs) 10:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.