Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Teppenpaw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox 11:57, 28 May '06

[edit] Mike Teppenpaw

NN bio. [1] 111 GHits isn't really notable. Beno1000 22:38, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

This bio referes to one of the host from the FirstTake podcast. And the first hit from the google search finds the correct person. Thumper369 17:42, 23 May 2006 (CST)

• Comment again, it's not a verifability issue. It's a notability issue. He isn't a person worthy of a Wikipedia article, I'm sorry to say. Beno1000 22:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Richardcavell 23:01, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per same reasoning as deletion of the podcast, which is his only claim of notability. -- Kicking222 23:39, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Non-notable. Does not meet WP:BIO. —ERcheck @ 03:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

I agree I have seen the error of my ways. Actually, I understand things a lot better now. I am not able to post any form of notability as suggested. Thank you all for your time. Thumper369

Beno, can I suggest a little more compassion and help to new authors. I understand the need to help keep Wikipedia a good source of information. I could have come to the same conclusion about the state of my articles without the negative feedback. I don't see how your negativity helps build a community (see Talk:Mike_Teppenpaw). Give a listen to the next show when we talk about Xmen. We will be sure to include a little commentary about this experience near the end of the show.

Good day, folks. I am Pharmhog and I approve of this message. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pharmhog (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.