Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Summers (media/wrestling personality)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted per CSD G7. Log PeaceNT 13:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mike Summers (media/wrestling personality)

Mike Summers (media/wrestling personality) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article was created by the subject and while claims have been made to the contrary on the talk page, conflict of interest remains a serious issue, particularly in the controversy section. COI not withstanding notability and sourcing are also a problem. Currently all info is sourced from the subjects own webpage, the webpage of his former employer a wrestling promotion and a profile on Online World of Wrestling, a website on which the profiles are largely user submited. If other source are provided during this AfD I would be happy to change my vote but currently it stands as Delete Daniel J. Leivick 18:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

I protest the so-called "nomination" for Articles of deletion. I have every right to have a page here just as much as everyone else. This was in response to a couple of profiles that had my name on them. People wanted to know more about me, so my page was put up... only to have it continuously "nominated" for deletion. Mr. Leivick has voted it to be "deleted" which I also protest. I will NOT be responsible for other individuals who bash this site if it comes to that. Online World Of Wrestling and Obsessed With Wrestling are not even bothering to protest because of past dealings with Wikipedia. DO NOT DELETE!!! Summers95926 22:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Comment No, you don't have "every right to have a page here as much as everyone else." Because everyone else does not have their own page here. You may wish to take a look at Wikipedia is not a Soapbox, especially sections 2 and 3, and Wikipedia is not a personal webspace. Self-published articles are often scrutinized to a greater degree. You may also want to sample WP:AUTOBIO and WP:COI. -Not taking a stand yet on the AfD until I've had time to read through it. LaughingVulcan 23:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Response Fine. But when I become well-known, you'll practically be begging to have my page put back up. I promise you that! -- "The Standard" Mike Summers

Response When you meet the notability guidelines for people, an article about you may (or will) be put back up. (Assuming that the AfD consensus here becomes Delete.) LaughingVulcan 00:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC) (Missed sig...)

Just to clarify no one will have to beg, subjects cannot control their own pages. --Daniel J. Leivick 20:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

I totally agree with Mr. Summers - he has every right to have a page. I VOTE KEEP THE PAGE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.35.249.247 (talk • contribs)

Note: Anonymous author then blanked nominator's user and talk pages. -- Gogo Dodo 18:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Delete as per nom; appears to have no notability content and appears to be a vanity page. LaughingVulcan 03:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.