Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Naso

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. dbenbenn | talk 19:48, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mike Naso

Vanity. Gamaliel 03:58, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

  • Comment: See also the attached Image:Floydbuster 2.JPG and the linked article Keystone Phil. 68.81.231.127 04:35, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep --Newprogressive 04:54, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Above user is author of the article.
  • Above user is also a subject of the article.
  • To be fair, he also helped write quite a bit of it --Newprogressive 06:20, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete this bad role playing game. Samaritan 05:34, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete--nixie 05:38, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep
    • The above by User:Scpivo21, in his/her first day of editing, whose only other edits are to Idjut crew. RickK 07:35, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
  • Micronationcruft. And of the utmost nonsensical epitome of it. Delete. RickK 06:22, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. gives appearance of notability that is not deserved. not-notable. RJFJR 06:25, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep
    • The above by User:4.4.52.153. RickK 07:34, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. ComCat.
  • Keep Anyone against this denys Mike Nasos landslide abilities.
    • The above from User:4.4.52.153. RickK 08:00, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable, vanity, and mostly nonsense. Megan1967 08:01, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non notable, vanity, nonsense, sockpuppets. Jayjg (talk) 21:18, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Has no real information value what so ever. JimmyShelter 09:28, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity. If he's really that important someone who doesn't know him personally will write the article. Not notable, no clear explanation of what Atlasia really is. Mgm|(talk) 09:36, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Egotistical nonsensical delusional fictional micronation cruft. Average Earthman 10:23, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete; and to think that all this furthers entropy...Lectonar 10:38, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as micronation-related. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:45, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nonsensical vanity. jni 13:47, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • I denys Mike Nasos (where's the apostrophe?) landslide abilities. Does that mean he's capable of starting landslides? No big whoop. :^P Delete as vanity, though better written than most. - Lucky 6.9 19:18, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nonsense, vanity, sockpuppets...this page has it all. Carrp | Talk 19:20, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete this prankish vanity, note the heavy smell of socks. Wyss 19:57, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: This will likely now be deleted, though I would like to thank Lucky 6.9 for saying that its well written. I would also ask why there is a heavy smell of socks. I would also like to challenge the defintion "vanity", since this isn't written by the person it pertains to. Vanity has many definitions under the dictionary, and I believe that this particular page is better fitted by "total and utter b****ks" or similar. --New Progressive 20:33, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • See Wikipedia:Vanity.
  • Read that, but it really is so vague as to encompass all manner of sin. You people really ought to come up with something a little more specific --New Progressive 00:43, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Don't deny his vigour and decisiveness. He will destroy you with an exploding ballot.Dubya 2004 19:55 8 Feb 2005
  • Please don't do what? There's no plan to troll over wikipedia or any such action. BTW we are fine for you to delete it now since we have acquired our own wiki site; I hope this meets with the approval of the guy who has a problem with entropy. With Vigour and Decisiveness --New Progressive 15:47, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
    • Create accounts for frivolous or fradulent reasons. Wikipedia:Sock puppet may also explain some earlier references. 68.81.231.127 01:03, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity. Non-encyclopaedic. Also possibly criminal for impersonating the White House Chief of Staff? The article should at least stop inappropriately using the succession box. --bainer 04:06, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Totally irrelevent and pure vanity. Plus, we have to keep egos in check, there's only so much space in the world afterall. --Kross 8:55, 10 Feb 2005 (EST)
  • Delete I am aware of the community surrounding this article. There are no sock puppets involved, I don't think. It is just a number of people conspiring for a joke and should be deleted. I don't see malicious intent. --131.191.48.179 01:01, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete -his hair is enough for a deletion vote on its own -nonsense Brookie 15:02, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, pure vanity, not notable GeneralPatton 01:41, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete already. (It is funny, though.) Rlw 17:05, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.